SurveyMarkup
Run the QA engine
QA engine · synthetic sample job

Run the QA engine on a sample job.

One click runs the rule-based checks on a fixed fictional job: reference frame, prism constants, heights, MGA zone, GNSS quality, duplicate points, traverse misclose and more.

Runs on example data. Advisory only; a registered surveyor still reviews and signs off.

QA engine run on the sample job

QA demo · synthetic sample

Final statutory and professional assessment requires a registered Australian surveyor. Engine results are checking aids only. Every deliverable, lodgement, legal/cadastral decision and sign-off remains with a registered/licensed surveyor.

UNVERIFIED SURVEY RULES — These checks are advisory only and must not be relied on for cadastral, engineering, construction, or legal survey deliverables until reviewed by a registered Australian surveyor.

Separate illustration · project and survey metadata

The metadata fields the engine tracks.

Every project and survey field the QA engine tracks: job, coordinate reference, survey method, GNSS quality and linework. Pre-filled with example values and editable in your browser (exportable as JSON). Editing it does not change the run above.

All project/survey metadata fields the engine tracks. Pre‑filled with a synthetic sample; edits stay in your browser (nothing is uploaded or saved). Advisory only — not a survey deliverable.

Project / job
Coordinate / reference
Survey method
GNSS quality
Linework / data-quality (sample)
CodeLayerGeometryPointEastingNorthingRLClosure (m)
KERBKERBline100312045.126251010.545.21—
FENCEFENCEline120312060.46251022.145.4—
BLDGBUILDINGpolygon200312080625104045.60.012
OK
Datum / AUSGeoid pairing

GDA2020 with AUSGeoid2020 is a consistent pairing (advisory note only).

CRS comparison (design preview)WARN
Design preview only · coordinate outputs remain unverified
Source metadata
Project setup
Datum
GDA2020
MGA zone
56
Geoid model
AUSGeoid2020
Vertical datum
AHD
Epoch
2020.0
Grid / ground
Grid
Combined scale factor
0.99959
Review metadata
Office review
Datum
GDA2020
MGA zone
56
Geoid model
AUSGeoid2020
Vertical datum
AHD
Epoch
2020.0
Grid / ground
Ground
Combined scale factor
0.99959
  • Grid / ground differs between source and review (Grid → Ground) — illustrative and location-dependent.

Registered surveyor confirmation required before use. Any shift examples are illustrative and location-dependent, not a final coordinate result.

Separate illustration

What a closure plot shows.

A second, smaller fictional traverse, drawn to show how a misclose vector reads on a plot. It is not the engine's sample job, so its numbers differ from the run above.

Traverse closure · illustrative traverse, not the engine sample Unverified rule
Misclose vector: 45 mm · UNVERIFIED · compare with the job tolerance
legs
4
ΣdE
0.000 m
ΣdN
0.045 m
misclose
0.045 m

A registered surveyor reviews the plot and makes every professional decision before use.

Before you start · QA demo

Use this when you want a narrow review aid before human checking. Outputs are advisory only and unverified; outputs are not for survey deliverables. Registered surveyor confirmation is required.

Advisory only

Input you have

Use this when you want to explore a fixed synthetic dataset with no upload, no account, and editable metadata.

What it helps review

It helps review deterministic QA labels, metadata context, explanation wording, closure preview, and sign-off preview status.

What it cannot prove

It cannot prove anything about a real project, real field file, source-data quality, or professional conclusions.

What to check next

Check the docs, supported-file register, and the specific tool page that matches the file you actually have.

Read the docsCheck supported filesGet sample filesOpen Report Reader
Demo limitations & data safety

This demo runs on a fixed synthetic dataset — no upload and no account.

  • Results are advisory and UNVERIFIED — a checking aid, not a conclusion.
  • Your source / original files are never modified.
  • Exports are reviewer handoff notes — not survey deliverables.
  • Registered surveyor confirmation is required before reliance.
  • During the synthetic public beta, use the bundled fictional examples only.
Review path · QA demo

SurveyMarkup is a step in a human-in-the-loop review. Every path stays advisory and unverified and ends with a registered surveyor.

  1. 1Load a synthetic sample
  2. 2Review the advisory findings
  3. 3Inspect the linked evidence
  4. 4Export a review summary
  5. Registered surveyor confirmation required
What to check next
  • Project & survey metadata
  • Advisory findings (OK / WARN / FAIL / REF / CHECK)
  • Source-linked explanation and stated limits
  • Sign-off design preview (inert; never confirms a rule)

Use any export as a reviewer handoff note, not a survey deliverable. Outputs remain unverified; registered surveyor confirmation required. Your source / original files are unchanged.

Synthetic data

Try the tools with sample files.

Download fictional sample files to use across Report Reader, Map Linework and PDF Markup. No real client data is needed.

Synthetic sample files
README
PUBLIC BETA — ADVISORY ONLY. Not for survey deliverables. These files are synthetic — use them to try the tools without uploading real or confidential client data. Every result is advisory and unverified; a registered surveyor must confirm it.
  • .rptReport Reader — synthetic .rpt
    Download
    Demonstrates
    A full plain-text reduction report with instrument, station, misclosures, residual and control points.
    May trigger
    Missing face observation, unclear setup method, high residual (UNVERIFIED), pole-height (ADVISORY) and parse-confidence warnings.
    Next step
    Review the parsed metadata and advisory panels, then export the HTML summary. Every professional decision remains with the registered surveyor.
  • .txtReport Reader — synthetic .txt
    Download
    Demonstrates
    A simpler plain-text report with a single caution line and a clean error count.
    May trigger
    One advisory warning line; low overall warning count.
    Next step
    Compare the extracted summary lines against the original; treat all output as advisory.
  • .csvMap Linework — synthetic .csv
    Download
    Demonstrates
    Coded survey points (KERB, BLDG) with fictional MGA-style coordinates.
    May trigger
    Missing feature code, a near-duplicate point and an open polygon for the data-quality checks to flag.
    Next step
    Run the field-data QA checks and review the export-readiness checklist before any export.
  • .geojsonMap Linework — synthetic .geojson
    Download
    Demonstrates
    The same synthetic linework as GeoJSON features, carrying the advisory note.
    May trigger
    CRS / coordinate correctness must be confirmed by a surveyor before downstream use.
    Next step
    Inspect the geometry in your GIS, but confirm CRS and coordinates before relying on it.
  • .jsonPDF Markup — synthetic evidence set
    Download
    Demonstrates
    Four evidence items: one linked, one unlinked, one needs-review and one missing, with a measurement and reviewer notes.
    May trigger
    NEEDS REVIEW (missing + needs-review), ADVISORY (unlinked) and UNVERIFIED (measurement) advisories.
    Next step
    Review linked vs unlinked evidence and the missing-evidence advisories, then export the evidence summary.

New here? Read the documentation for how each tool works and what advisory, needs-review and unverified mean.

Design preview · advisory only

Registered-surveyor review workflow (design preview).

A preview of a future workflow that would track a registered surveyor's review. It is inert: it tracks workflow status only, never confirms a rule and never records a surveyor's confirmation on anyone's behalf.

Design preview only — this workflow does not confirm any survey rule, does not record a surveyor confirmation, and does not create a survey deliverable.

Final statutory and professional assessment requires a registered Australian surveyor. Engine results are checking aids only. Every deliverable, lodgement, legal/cadastral decision and sign-off remains with a registered/licensed surveyor.

1 · Review workflow status
Awaiting registered surveyordesign preview
  1. Not started
  2. Draft review
  3. Awaiting registered surveyor
  4. Comments received
  5. Changes required
  6. Future confirmation placeholder
  7. Blocked — unverified
2 · Required registered surveyor details
Reviewer name
(unassigned — design preview)
Reviewer role
Registered surveyor (to be assigned)
Registration no.
—
Jurisdiction
NSW (demo reference)

Placeholder fields — no surveyor is assigned in this preview.

3 · Rule source / version / effective date
Rule source document
Jurisdiction surveying regulation (demo reference)
Source version
demo-v0
Effective date
—
Reviewed at
—
4 · Unresolved items
  • Loop 5 closure 0.045 m — review against the applicable tolerance (unverified).
  • Face observations not detected — needs review.
5 · Evidence needed
  • Synthetic QA demo report
  • Synthetic PDF evidence set (ANN-001…ANN-004)
6 · Comments / exceptions
Comments
  • Design preview — no registered-surveyor review has occurred.
Exceptions
  • Tolerance set not surveyor-confirmed (stays unverified).
7 · What this workflow does NOT do
  • Does not record a surveyor confirmation or confirm any survey rule.
  • Keeps tolerance confirmation and every QA-engine result unchanged and UNVERIFIED.
  • Keeps every legal and regulatory acceptance decision with the responsible professional.
  • Produces an advisory review record; every survey deliverable remains the registered surveyor's responsibility.
  • A registered surveyor's professional judgement and sign-off remain entirely manual and outside this tool.
8 · Future confirmation placeholder
Confirmation disabled in design preview

A future registered-surveyor confirmation step would live here. It is intentionally inert: there is no control that records a surveyor confirmation, and the audit note records that no confirmation was performed — “No confirmation performed in this design preview; surveyor_confirmed stays false.”.